Crazy For Feet Forum

Am I the only guy here whose tired of seeing women wearing sneakers, boots and sandals? Is it me or women are wearing high heels a lot less. If they are wearing high heels its usually when they go to work or a party. Every time I watch Mad Men the fetishist inside of me cries. Every time I watch that show it makes me feel like I was born too late. I still can't believe that there was a time where it extremely common for women to wear stockings and high heels. Now most women wear sock and sneakers. I'm not saying that the 60s was a perfect era but if there was one aspect of it I wish we still had today I would probably pick that. It sort of sucks now for guys who are into girls wearing low cut shoes and stockings. I wonder what made women decide to wear high heels less? Who knows maybe in the future women might just stop wearing high heels. What do you guys thinks?

It's just cyclical...currently, boots and flats are what's popular. I think just like 5 years ago or so, the pump was real popular. The high heels will come back, the nylons, maybe not!

I just wish women would quit thinking that "flip flops" are okay to go to bars and dinner in...they suck!

I totally agree with Mr. Mike.

I love girls in boots, high heels, scarpins... But everytime I see a girl in flip flops I get so disappointed.... It's just ugly girls wearing flip flops. Even if the girl has pretty feet... It's not nice.

But in general, I think it's just a question of preference about what that girl in specific likes to wear.

Yeah unfortuneately women want to to be comfortable instead of looking feminine.I agree with you women should dress like they did in the 60s with dresses hose and heels/flats everywhere.Back then you knew a woman was a woman.

I just dont know...I rarely find the "total package" which is hose and dippable shoes.Im at this temp assignment and the women are all over the place.Some wear boots,heels but no hose,flats but no hose.Then some wear hose or socks but with loafers that they cant dip out of I mentioned in a recent post how this one hot lady wore a dress and hose with suede pumps but the there was a strap on the pumps.So I settled for looking at her legs but at lunch she removed her hose?I cant win.But a couple of ladies did wear skirt and heels and fishnets but no dipping?Its a no win situation

it is funny to see how women's behaviour is not related to how they dress.
i just left my ex girlfriend one month ago. she was very feminine, always dressd in skirt, heeled shoes,nail plolished, black panties. during our 4 years relashionship i saw her dipping only once, never shoeplayed. she accepted my foot fetish but i could feel that she took no pleasure in that. it only to satisfy me. i can't complain because my fetish needs were mostly and partially fullfilled.
i met a new girl who most of the time wears boots or sneakers wearing ugly socks.the only time i saw her with flat and paties socks at a cafeteria, she shoeplayed. she has very seductive feet and quickly discovered my foot fetish. she spontaneously involved her feet to excite me. each time we are eating together she removes her shoe on put them on my lap. when i lay on the floor she often teases me saying that she likes to see how warm my dick gets to her cold feet.
i told her that it would me marvelous if she wore high heels, thin panties. she answered that she would love to but as her feet is very thin she always looses her shoes while walking or crossing her leg. so most of the time when she prefers boots or ugly flat shoes.
as a conclusion i would say that the way of clothing is not always related to fetish concsiousness. the top is when a women loves to feel seductive whith foot fetish and wears what drives us crazy and behaves as a great teaser by dipping dangling.. these ones are rare pearls.

In some cases you can blame companies on women feeling the need to dress down.I remember in the 90s and before women who worked at Sears wore dresses or nice slacks and nice feminine dress shoes.Now they dont.

footoncrotch wrote:it is funny to see how women's behaviour is not related to how they dress.
i just left my ex girlfriend one month ago. she was very feminine, always dressd in skirt, heeled shoes,nail plolished, black panties. during our 4 years relashionship i saw her dipping only once, never shoeplayed. she accepted my foot fetish but i could feel that she took no pleasure in that. it only to satisfy me. i can't complain because my fetish needs were mostly and partially fullfilled.
i met a new girl who most of the time wears boots or sneakers wearing ugly socks.the only time i saw her with flat and paties socks at a cafeteria, she shoeplayed. she has very seductive feet and quickly discovered my foot fetish. she spontaneously involved her feet to excite me. each time we are eating together she removes her shoe on put them on my lap. when i lay on the floor she often teases me saying that she likes to see how warm my dick gets to her cold feet.
i told her that it would me marvelous if she wore high heels, thin panties. she answered that she would love to but as her feet is very thin she always looses her shoes while walking or crossing her leg. so most of the time when she prefers boots or ugly flat shoes.
as a conclusion i would say that the way of clothing is not always related to fetish concsiousness. the top is when a women loves to feel seductive whith foot fetish and wears what drives us crazy and behaves as a great teaser by dipping dangling.. these ones are rare pearls.

You gotta wonder, in the 4 years she dipped only once, what made her do it just that time...high, painful heels?

Mr. Mike wrote:

footoncrotch wrote:it is funny to see how women's behaviour is not related to how they dress.
i just left my ex girlfriend one month ago. she was very feminine, always dressd in skirt, heeled shoes,nail plolished, black panties. during our 4 years relashionship i saw her dipping only once, never shoeplayed. she accepted my foot fetish but i could feel that she took no pleasure in that. it only to satisfy me. i can't complain because my fetish needs were mostly and partially fullfilled.
i met a new girl who most of the time wears boots or sneakers wearing ugly socks.the only time i saw her with flat and paties socks at a cafeteria, she shoeplayed. she has very seductive feet and quickly discovered my foot fetish. she spontaneously involved her feet to excite me. each time we are eating together she removes her shoe on put them on my lap. when i lay on the floor she often teases me saying that she likes to see how warm my dick gets to her cold feet.
i told her that it would me marvelous if she wore high heels, thin panties. she answered that she would love to but as her feet is very thin she always looses her shoes while walking or crossing her leg. so most of the time when she prefers boots or ugly flat shoes.
as a conclusion i would say that the way of clothing is not always related to fetish concsiousness. the top is when a women loves to feel seductive whith foot fetish and wears what drives us crazy and behaves as a great teaser by dipping dangling.. these ones are rare pearls.

You gotta wonder, in the 4 years she dipped only once, what made her do it just that time...high, painful heels?

maybe just because she is someone who never stays in a stand up position too long. whenever she can she sits cross her legs, and as she is not very nervous she never moves her feet, so no shoeplay.
this day she stayed stood up and did only one shoe removal and nothing more. the reason? probably unconsicous shoeplay

Actually I'm seeing heels worn more and more by women, just without hose - hopefully though the fact that Duchess Catherine wears hose will restart a trend

Yup...totally agree. I was lucky to witness some of the best shoeplay from the late 80's to mid 90's. That to me was the golden era of shoeplay. Hell....you could find it anywhere! In public, at school, on TV...anywhere.

I remember my daily habit of watching this host of Delaware Valley Forum...her name was Dori Lenz. She was old but hotdamn...she provided the best TV shoeplay at that time!

Ahhh...now I have to send requests to models to get what I want.