Candid clips on C4S are dead

[MDHOPKINS2]

So tell me please, where I can now find clips like candid hostess shoeplay, dipping, dangling, etc.? Do you know another website like C4S? Just tell me please! Especially, I love nylon candid shoeplay and dangling, and now, the clips on C4S are dead, also its a big tragedy for me!!! THX for your response!

[mlsp8484]

Check your PM. Thanks!

[nyllover]

Check your PM. Thanks!

I believe it would help others to share if you have a solution.

[mlsp8484]

Well, i really wish i did...

i mean i did think along the lines of some sort of "Candid Shoeplay" board / market place and make available to ALL studio owners affected by C4S closure to start their own "Store Thread" and list their clips for interested buyers to view - and make contact to purchase directly. I mean there's always good demand ( for candid shoeplay ) and with enough publicity, the board could become the next "go to" place for such stuff!

But of course, my lack of IT knowledge means this is something beyond me...

[nyllover]

Well, that's something that was never forbidden here. If they follow our rules, they can open their thread, post previews, and a clear "contact me to purchase them" text in the signature.
If you know any of them, feel free to let them know this board can offer this

[mlsp8484]

Well, that's something that was never forbidden here. If they follow our rules, they can open their thread, post previews, and a clear "contact me to purchase them" text in the signature.
If you know any of them, feel free to let them know this board can offer this

Sounds like it could work...will the Board be having a section dedicated to this ? Or would we just put them in an existing one? I can try and talk to a a few Studio owners who might just wanna give it a go...

[Ricky732]

Just a quick question... if this https://www.clips4sale.com/studio/44419 ... shoeplay-2 is the only studio that is still online, it means that it's not real candid right?

[sleepdog]

Just a quick question... if this https://www.clips4sale.com/studio/44419 ... shoeplay-2 is the only studio that is still online, it means that it's not real candid right?

In my opinion, real and fake are mixed together. I don't know if you remember another shop, 16847. Almost all his published works are fake, but all his works are still forcibly deleted.

[assy]

Selling candids can get you into hot water these days as a lot of countries have tightened their voyeur laws around this. Women usually don't take kindly to being recorded without their permission and the ensuing video being sold for wanking. Besides, most candids from the stores were either fake or rubbish. To top it off, some stores (notably Barefoot Park and Candid Dipping Dangling Shoeplay/Candid Shoeplay Dipping Dangling) threw in the odd kiddie shoeplay vid. WTF? You're that desperate that you have to record minors and then wank to that? Good riddance I say.

[Ricky732]

What the hell... Did they seriously have some children recorded?!?!?! That's so serious, I absolutely agree with you that AT LEAST they should be always +18...

[Ricky732]

Just a quick question... if this https://www.clips4sale.com/studio/44419 ... shoeplay-2 is the only studio that is still online, it means that it's not real candid right?

In my opinion, real and fake are mixed together. I don't know if you remember another shop, 16847. Almost all his published works are fake, but all his works are still forcibly deleted.

I don't know how clips4sale works, but I suppose you have to proof that you have the consent of all the girls you are recording and publishing to make your store still online... What makes me surprised is, that store has "candid" in the title and in every title but it's still online... There must be a contract between the guy and the girls to make it still online, I don't see any other solution . Legster who was recording hostesses, if I remember correctly, most of his works were not staged but not candid (he asked the hostesses if he could record them I think and then start recording), but he was taken down too

[Collegetownstudios]

You're that desperate that you have to record minors and then wank to that?

I thought it was just taking advantage of another market.

[ShoeplayJ]

But of course, my lack of IT knowledge means this is something beyond me...

But not beyond meee lol. No really though, in my spare time I've been working on a little something since this all started. No promises as to how well it will work or how soon it'll be done (so if someone else happens to beat me to the punch with a similar or better idea then so be it).

I'll speak more on it when I have something to show.

[sleepdog]

Just a quick question... if this https://www.clips4sale.com/studio/44419 ... shoeplay-2 is the only studio that is still online, it means that it's not real candid right?

In my opinion, real and fake are mixed together. I don't know if you remember another shop, 16847. Almost all his published works are fake, but all his works are still forcibly deleted.

I don't know how clips4sale works, but I suppose you have to proof that you have the consent of all the girls you are recording and publishing to make your store still online... What makes me surprised is, that store has "candid" in the title and in every title but it's still online... There must be a contract between the guy and the girls to make it still online, I don't see any other solution . Legster who was recording hostesses, if I remember correctly, most of his works were not staged but not candid (he asked the hostesses if he could record them I think and then start recording), but he was taken down too

I communicated with the author of 2922 (MauroVieri) by email before,and I have some questions about Legster's works.
At last, after his understanding of Legster, and then combining my intuition and experience, I finally determined that Legster's works are carefully planned stage plays.Here is his explanation：

Whoever knows fairs knows that every girl has her own dipping style, her own way of sliding the feet out of the shoes different from others; don’t you wonder why all girls of Legster perform the same movements with their foot suspended on air and the sole in plain view toward the camera? It is very simple, because he shows them by the smartphone the movements that they must do. Very few dippers lift feet up in the air like hostesses of 16847 do and, above all, almost all dippers try to not be seen when they are doing shoeplay and in fact in all real candid clips you can notice how the author is often obliged to work in difficult conditions with a partial view of the scene, to change often position; but all these problems do not happen in the clips of 16847.

[Collegetownstudios]

In my opinion, real and fake are mixed together. I don't know if you remember another shop, 16847. Almost all his published works are fake, but all his works are still forcibly deleted.

I don't know how clips4sale works, but I suppose you have to proof that you have the consent of all the girls you are recording and publishing to make your store still online... What makes me surprised is, that store has "candid" in the title and in every title but it's still online... There must be a contract between the guy and the girls to make it still online, I don't see any other solution . Legster who was recording hostesses, if I remember correctly, most of his works were not staged but not candid (he asked the hostesses if he could record them I think and then start recording), but he was taken down too

I communicated with the author of 2922 (MauroVieri) by email before,and I have some questions about Legster's works.
At last, after his understanding of Legster, and then combining my intuition and experience, I finally determined that Legster's works are carefully planned stage plays.Here is his explanation：

Whoever knows fairs knows that every girl has her own dipping style, her own way of sliding the feet out of the shoes different from others; don’t you wonder why all girls of Legster perform the same movements with their foot suspended on air and the sole in plain view toward the camera? It is very simple, because he shows them by the smartphone the movements that they must do. Very few dippers lift feet up in the air like hostesses of 16847 do and, above all, almost all dippers try to not be seen when they are doing shoeplay and in fact in all real candid clips you can notice how the author is often obliged to work in difficult conditions with a partial view of the scene, to change often position; but all these problems do not happen in the clips of 16847.

Legster already said he speaks to the women and asks permission first.

However, this message is funny because a lot of people have said the same things about my own candids.

But among their own friends and only once to my face.

But if Legster had said nothing, would we truly know if Maurovieri was correct?
Does he know him personally?
What makes Mauro an authority?

[ShoeplayJ]

It's interesting hearing that about Legster, but then again I've always had a hunch that much of the candid stuff I came across was staged in some fashion, even as a teenager 20 years ago just discovering that other people liked this stuff and took video of it. I'm also a bit of a closet pessimist or skeptic (to a fault) so there's that heh.

I know I'm in the minority and someone will probably tell me my standards are super low — but with all the rumors and claims about who's staging and who's legit, this is one reason I've always taken the "candid" label with a grain of salt and just judged whether or not the material looked good to me.
For me, as long as the scenario and setting/location look reasonably real enough, if the WOMAN has nice feet and footwear and her movements don't look too calculated or thought out then I'm on it. It's not so much settling as it is just allowing myself to enjoy it if everything else except being candid checks out.

Sorry for the tangent.

[Ricky732]

It's interesting hearing that about Legster, but then again I've always had a hunch that much of the candid stuff I came across was staged in some fashion, even as a teenager 20 years ago just discovering that other people liked this stuff and took video of it. I'm also a bit of a closet pessimist or skeptic (to a fault) so there's that heh.

I know I'm in the minority and someone will probably tell me my standards are super low — but with all the rumors and claims about who's staging and who's legit, this is one reason I've always taken the "candid" label with a grain of salt and just judged whether or not the material looked good to me.
For me, as long as the scenario and setting/location look reasonably real enough, if the WOMAN has nice feet and footwear and her movements don't look too calculated or thought out then I'm on it. It's not so much settling as it is just allowing myself to enjoy it if everything else except being candid checks out.

Sorry for the tangent.

I don't understand why they suspended legster if they are staged honestly... On the "candid" thing, I think that the use of a very good camera, closeups and changing position makes it worse and difficult to believe. A perfect video makes us doubting a lot.. For example if I see a candid recorded by phone, with a bit of hands shaking while recording, I am happy because I am 100% sure that it's candid

[mlsp8484]

But of course, my lack of IT knowledge means this is something beyond me...

But not beyond meee lol. No really though, in my spare time I've been working on a little something since this all started. No promises as to how well it will work or how soon it'll be done (so if someone else happens to beat me to the punch with a similar or better idea then so be it).

I'll speak more on it when I have something to show.

Oh thats nice to know...hopefully it can be a great new resource for keen buyer / sellers... Looking forward...

[assy]

Legster admitted as much on the intro of his c4s store that he asks the hostesses first before recording the clips. My guess for the ban is that he did not have any release forms as I highly doubt that hostesses would agree to have these clips sold for money on porn sites.
Mauro's clips look mostly real as I usually have to cut out around 90% of his stuff to be left with maybe a minute or two of worthwhile shoeplay. The stuff with his language teachers was obviously staged, though.

[Collegetownstudios]

On the "candid" thing, I think that the use of a very good camera, closeups and changing position makes it worse and difficult to believe.

This is a very valid point. I, and others I know, tend to film in as high a quality as possible for the purposes of preserving the videos long term. And there is just something about those old grainy videos that just look more true to candid.

Now that you've pointed it out, it's definitely that our camera qualities are higher than what most people would bother to even purchase to record. I spent $800 for my own camcorders, used. Most people would buy the $150 - $200 cameras and be happy.

Thanks for that point of understanding.